|
Please
don't buy the book at the left -- he's made enough money already, and
besides...it's not that great a book. But its subtitle holds an important
idea: "the power of authentic stories in a low-trust world." While
his proscription is to tell better stories, the real problem is we live in a
low-trust world... and we don't do enough to build trust.
Trust is what allows you to take risks. Trust is what lets you engage a
consultant in a mission-critical project even when you can't take a test drive
(because the solution hasn't been built yet). Somebody Brilliant™ defined trust as
"fidelity without control" -- the ability get what you expect even when the
other party doesn't work for you.
Trust is what makes most B2B sales cycles really happen, and makes any
marketing effective.
|
|
|
Factoids
In cyberspace, most of the time human
relationships are distant and not tightly defined. Even though you're
dealing with online avatars, over time they can gain trustworthy status.
In large online communities like Amazon, eBay, special-interest Forums, open source
projects, and the blogosphere, recommendations, opinions, and peer reviews from
unknown individuals gather an amazing amount of influence from "the wisdom of crowds."
For example, Forrester research found that
60% of online purchasers find online peer reviews helpful in making decisions.
Meanwhile, only 13% of people bought products because of ads and only half
of them thought that ads were truthful (aka could be trusted).
In a recent UK study, 16% of
consumers' purchase decisions were influenced by advertising. 71% of
their purchases were influenced by experience of colleagues and friends.
Partner marketing (or affiliate
networks) are every bit as effective online as in the physical world because
trust and credibility are transferable.
If an online visitor comes to
your site via one of your marketing
affiliates, they are 43% more likely
to convert online than consumers directed from other sites or search engines.
Even though "everybody knows" that internet
information is rarely accurate, WikiPedia' self-policing system has made it
one of the most trusted sources of information -- both online and offline.
The top four most trusted sources of information on the web are: eBay,
Google, Newspaper sites, and WikiPedia. |
|
Trust
Trust is at the core of credibility and influence. People with something
to sell and who push it hard have very low credibility (think used cars,
get-rich-quick schemes, Ron Popiel). Regis McKenna's marketing
influence pyramid enshrined levels of credibility from the customer's
perspective: first, their friends; then colleagues; then
gurus/pundits/analysts/press; and finally, at the lowest level, the vendors.
In cyberspace, the pyramid has been reborn, with social networking and bloggers
replacing the middle two layers (colleagues and press).
It can all be boiled down to one sentence: "nothing is as credible as
someone who has nothing to sell."
A
2004 RoperASW report found that over 90 percent of
Americans cite word of mouth as one of their best sources of ideas and
information. Further, they rate word of mouth twice as important in their
decision-making as advertising
or editorial content -- and we put one-and-a-half times more value on word of
mouth today than we did 25 years ago.
According to a December 2005 McKinsey report, approximately two-thirds of all
US economic activity is influenced by shared opinions about a product,
brand or service.
In the explosion of low-quality information that is the internet (which only exacerbates our
low-trust world), the opinions of friends, peers, and even competitors become
really important. That's why
reference marketing is so powerful. That's why most
advertising isn't.
Trust is one of the most expensive commodities in the world:
you can't buy it from anyone, and building it can take quite a while
indeed. Rebuilding it takes even longer.
Trust isn't directly correlated with high performance, but it is related to
brand value. Customers develop a model or
an image about a vendor or product or entity's trustworthiness, and use that
model to make their judgments. For example:
-
For the third year running, the US Postal Service
has been rated the most trusted agency in government when it comes to
protecting privacy. Now while it's
easy for the postal service to beat all the elected officials who voted to
compromise our privacy, it's
surprising that USPS beat out the the SEC, the FBI and the police.
The USPS is not highly trusted because it did the most for security, or innovated
the most, or prevented identify theft, or made mailboxes secure, or even --god forbid -- had good service. It's trusted
because its behavior and performance are very consistent over time, and are
exactly in line with what we expected of them (not much).
-
For the last 40 years, consumers could trust that
Cadillac made a pretty crummy car that had old styling, bad gas mileage,
marginal quality, and crummy performance. You didn't need to own one
to know this. Now that their cars have serious innovation, great styling,
mileage, performance, and quality, few consumers have noticed. We can't trust Cadillac's
new behavior because they don't fit our mental model. It'll take years
for consumers to adjust their expectations of Cadillac and trust them to
make
a great car.
-
Trust is actually more important than "quality" or even "price."
If you have serious trust, you know that any quality
problem will be resolved efficiently and well. With deep trust,
you're willing to pay more for a product or service because you know you're going to get
more value.
Businesses Opportunities Built on Trust
In recent years, a number of movements and companies have been built
on trust relationships. Here are some success stories with brief explanations:
-
Open Source: Community = Trust
The larger the community and the broader the base of code access, the more
you
can trust the code to be secure, high quality, and have rapid innovation.
Having thousands of eyeballs on the code increases the trustworthiness
of the software, even if no vendor or standards body is there to stand by it.
-
ClueTrain Manifesto: Ongoing conversation = Trust
The core argument of this 1999 manifesto is that commerce is a conversation:
the more open and continuous the conversation, the better the quality of the
relationship, the "fit" of the product, and that trustworthiness of the
commerce. This thesis has been radically expanded with the advent of
corporate blogs, online user forums, and customer surveying / scoring
systems that engage prospects and customers in a continuous conversation
throughout the product lifecycle.
-
Seth
Godin: Permission = Trust
In
Permission-Based Marketing, Godin makes the case that in
the online world the way to achieve the oxymoron of credible ads is to
do marketing only when you have permission... and to live up to that permission with
marketing that is actually relevant to the customer. Recent Forrester
surveys show that opt-in emails are trusted twice as much as TV ads and 10
times as much as banner ads, simply because the consumer chose to engage. This has profound
repercussions on
community-of-interest marketing.
-
Enterprise software: References = Trust
In the last millennium, Enterprise sales reps burned out a lot of
credibility with high-pressure tactics. The press also lost credibility by
too often being vendor shills. So the only way a customer could trust
vendors was
through customer references that could be contacted in advance of the sale.
Even in this millennium, nothing is more powerful for marketing.
-
Gartner Group: Access = Trust
The Gartner Group owns the IT industry analyst business because they have
unparalleled access to vendor and customer information about products.
In the offline world, they act as a clearinghouse for "the real story"
(ranging from rumors to insider information), and have status as trusted
advisors to every one of the Fortune 500. I haven't found an
organization in cyberspace with the kind of private access that Gartner
achieved in the offline world.
-
Google: Relevance = Trust
It's hard to remember that Google was not a first or even a second mover in search. But they dominated the market because they
were able to come up with more relevant search results than anyone else.
Not only was their engine faster, it didn't succumb to spam and porno the way
AltaVista and other engines did. By consistently outperforming the
other engines on relevance, they have become the default entry point for
accessing the web. On top of this trust, they have been able to build
an advertising business that increases the relevance of their results (about
1/3 of the time, people click on the ads rather than the "natural search"
list).

Measuring Trust
In the old days, there were survey services to measure trust and credibility.
JD Power, Consumer Reports, the University of Michigan, and other specialized
survey organizations established nationwide standards for measuring quality,
customer satisfaction, and trust. While these are still incredibly
useful services for both vendors and customers, they're also really expensive and
involve significant delay.
The online world has established new benchmarks for speed and specificity of
metrics. They can be statistically valid within days, and provide
important markers for credibility and trust:
-
eBay buyer and seller ratings, based on feedback
from each transaction in the users' history
-
Amazon customer reviews of books and other
articles
-
Digg and dozens of cloned services for user
ratings of articles and blog entries
-
ePinions and other ratings of product quality,
features, and value
-
del.icio.us, slashdot, and other social
bookmarking / ranking services
Each of these systems uses the wisdom of crowds and social / swarming techniques
to come up with specific measurements of trust. Each of these metrics is a
powerful tool for marketing, both on-line and off.
But in commerce, serious research has all but proven that only one
metric really matters for profitability: would your customers recommend
your product/service to others? This net ranking -- you among your
customers -- is the quantification of
word-of-mouth and referencability.
There are a couple of companies focused on the simple yet powerful idea of the net
promoter score. NetPromoter, based on the book "The Ultimate Question,"
provides a set of tools to calculate your
score,
with guidelines for improving it.
What to do About Trust
Trust must be earned and is best built through transparency and
consistency of your behavior. First off, you have to stand for
something, and be clear internally that you value it and will reward supporting behaviors.
Quietly but firmly let people know what you believe in. Don't make claims
that you don't really expect to deliver on. Identify and expunge
weenies who don't or can't follow through. Never blow your own horn:
get customers and partners to do it for you.
Ask your customers the Ultimate Question regularly, systematically, and openly.
Track and publicize the results. Identify the three types of customers:
promoters, neutrals, and detractors, and work on the detractors first.
Figure out whether each detractor is (1) justified because you set
expectations wrong, (2) justified because you did something wrong, or, (3)
is just plain wrong. No matter which category they fall into, you
need to move them to at least neutral because the damage they do can be 5 times
more powerful than the happy effects from your promoters. The good news is
that really fixing a detractor can make them into your most avid promoter,
because their conversion builds trust about your company and what it really stands for.
Digg
This!
Market Power
-- coming in April
Contents
copyright 2007 by DOTnet Consulting, Inc., all rights reserved.
Somebody Brilliant™ is a trademark of DOTnet Consulting, referring to its principal.
Feel free to forward this report, but you must include this copyright notice.
All trademarks and graphics are the property of their respective owners.
This newsletter was mailed to you because our records show you asked to receive
it.
Click
here to opt-out of future newsletters, although that will make us feel very sad.
|