| "There
is absolutely no proof of that global warming is caused by man.
These left-wing kooks think that man is so important that he is doing
what only god can do." |
Global Warming
There's
no much doubt that the earth is warming up in most places. Most glaciers
and ice-caps are receding and will be gone by the end of this century.
The
people who make the noise against global warming say there's no proof it's
caused by man or energy usage. And in the strictest sense, they're
right: we don't know.
But
that's twisting science: the pure scientist never knows until
there's a mountain of data with no unexplained variants. That will be
about 100 years from now. By the time every scientist agrees, it will be way too late to do
anything about global warming.
Weather and
the atmospheric are unstable systems, so forecasting is an inexact science even
with the biggest computers in the world. Even so, 100% of peer-reviewed scientific
papers on global warming -- the ones that count -- conclude that man's energy
consumption is the driving force behind global warming.
Instead
of bickering over obscure scientific trivia, figure this issue out for yourself
a different way: what do the people on one side or the other have to
gain from this argument? Do the people on the "man is
responsible" side have anything to gain? If they're right, they will
have to change their lifestyle in unattractive ways.
Do
the people on the "global warming is just a coincidence" side have
anything to gain? Seems to me that the oil and automobile industries that
fund that side of the debate have a lot of profits at stake.
Find
out more...
What
did we get wrong?
Contents copyright 2006 by DOTnet Consulting, Inc,
all rights reserved.
Feel free to forward this report, but you must include this copyright notice.
All trademarks and graphics are the property of their respective owners.
|